
Clarifying knowledge limitations
I need to be careful about our knowledge being possibly outdated and avoid giving unverified current updates. Maybe I should ask if the user wants me to check real-time sources instead. It seems I have network access without needing approval, as the default settings allow that. It looks like I can confirm news by browsing, but I should remember the 'shell' can run arbitrary commands, which could fetch news. I just want to ensure I’m using the tools correctly!Considering information options
I can use curl for web searches, but accessing search engines can sometimes be tricky. Instead, I should ask the user how they'd like me to handle the request. Maybe I can propose options like: 1) quick summary and background, 2) credibility assessment/source verification, 3) implications and tactical adaptation, 4) timeline and next steps, or 5) real-time updates. It's important to keep it concise and friendly while offering to check sources if they’re interested!
这是条转会传闻的标题。你想让我做哪种帮助?
- 快速梳理要点与背景(维尔纳当前合同、过往情况、迈阿密需求)
- 可信度评估与来源核验(德天空原文、其他跟进媒体)
- 潜在影响与战术适配(在迈阿密的角色、与梅西系搭配、MLS注册窗口)
- 时间线与下一步观察点
- 我现在就帮你查最新进展并汇总权威来源
选一个数字或告诉我更具体的需求。
.gif)